Report Cites Problems with Spinlock Deckvests

Posted by Darrell Nicholson at 03:42PM - Comments: (4)

September 10, 2013

Almost all of the inflatable PFD/harnesses we have tested tend to ride up around the neck when inflated.

Within a day of US Sailing releasing a report that concluded that four out of five Spinlock Deckests failed to work properly in a fatal sailing accident earlier this year, PS testers were in the water with a Spinlock Deckvest (5D, 170N, Pro-Sensor inflator), trying to figure out what might have gone wrong. The new Deckvest was among several racing PFDs we looked at in the July 2013 issue, and at that time, we found no significant problems with it. It and the Deckvest Lite earned Recommended ratings. The accident report re-emphasizes what we’ve said several times before—inflate and try your PFD in the water as soon as you buy it. Make sure it keeps your head afloat without riding up around your head and neck. Learn how to service it, and adjust it for ideal fit. If it doesn’t fit, send it back and try another model.

I won’t go into the details of the accident involving the Columbia 32C Uncontrollable Urge here. The full report covers that well—and I urge you to read it as well as the 2012 US Sailing accident reports. I’ll focus only on inflatable bladder design detail that the investigators apparently blame for the vest's failure. We have talked about this detail in the past, but in light of these findings, it bears repeating.

The main elements in the Spinlock Deckvest are the inflatable bladder and the neoprene harness/vest into which the bladder zips. On most inflatable PFD harnesses that we have tested, like those from Revere, Mustang, and West Marine, the bladder and the vest are integral components. The back of the bladder is sewn onto or thermo-welded to the vest. In some designs, however, like the Deckvest and the Bluestorm Xtreme, which we tested in August 2008, the bladders are joined to the vest at only three points—the top and the bottom of each side. An additional strap on the right side of the Deckvest holds the bladder close to the vest, but on the left side, there is none (see photo below). As a result, there can be a headsized gap between the vest and the bladder. If the vest is not cinched tightly, or if the inflatable PFD/harness does not have any crotch straps, the gap is even bigger, because the loose vest bunches up around the wearer’s neck and chest.

The bladder on the Spinlock Deckvest (right) isn't integral to the vest as it is on most other designs like the Revere Comfortmax PFD Harness (left).

According to the accounts of Uncontrollable Urge crewmembers who had problems with their Deckvests, it appears that wave action (and/or body movement in the water as the wearers attempted to swim or were rolled in heavy surf) pushed the left side of the bladder up and over their heads. Craig Williams, the lone sailor who died, was found in the water unconscious with the bladder “on one side of his head,” according to the report. From the description of the other crew members who had problems with their vests, it seems that in heavy surf a person’s head can squeeze through the gap between the vest and the bladder (or the entire left side of the vest slips over the head), and the PFD assumes this new lopsided position with the bladder on one side only.

Although we have not yet been unable to duplicate the scenario described in the accident report with our Deckvest, it could possibly occur if any of these conditions are present:

  • Crotch straps are missing or loose. These straps need to be as snug as possible when working on the boat, and can be snugged up even more in the water. (Unfortunately, snug fit quickly becomes a problem because the straps become uncomfortable after a short period.)
  • The vest is not tightened snugly against the body. Any vest should be fitted so that it can not ride up in the water. Have a partner try to lift you from the shoulder straps to check fit.
  • The vest is not fully inflated. Partial inflation can be an advantage if you are trying to gain more mobility in the water, either when climbing into a lifeboat or struggling in surf, but doing this opens the gap between the bladder and the vest. In our view, a partially deflated vest should still maintain its form and close fit.
  • Heavy breaking waves. Rough conditions can challenge any inflatable life jacket, even if it fits well and has a crotch strap.

The Bluestorm Extreme PFD/harness has a bladder that is separate from the vest. Testers noted that it tended to ride up more than other designs in our 2008 PFD/harness test.

It is possible that any of the inflatable harness/PFDs that we have tested could slip up or even completely off in the conditions encountered by the crew of Uncontrollable Urge. However, PFDs like the Deckvest and Bluestorm Xtreme that have the non-integral bladder seem to be more susceptible to fit issues in these conditions. This is another reason why we continue to prefer jackets with integral bladders like our Best Choice, the Mustang 3184, for offshore cruising, even though it is less compact. The Mustang 3184 is fitted with a hydrostatic Hammar inflator, which is more resistant to accidental inflation than other inflators, but it is more difficult to service. On the plus side, the interval between servicing is longer. Any of the other harness/PFDs that have earned Recommended ratings in the August 2008 or December 2006 issues would do as well.

The Spinlock Vests are the only vest with a non-integral bladder that we have given Recommended rating, and the basis of the recommendation rested greatly on the vest's compact fit when not inflated, and its easy-to-service Pro Sensor inflation system that resists accidental inflation. 

In an e-mail to PS, James Hall of Spinlock pointed out that the conditions the accident were extremely demanding for any vest. He said the company was in close contact with panel members who wrote the report and reviewing responses to the report to see if changes can be made to future product range.

"The bladder attachment of our lifejacket is not fundamentally different to the majority of inflatable lifejackets available," he said. "All lifejackets  already go through a number of rigorous approval tests that include a 10-feet jump test with an inflated bladder to ensures the lifejacket stays in position. Given the unique circumstances of the incident, manufacturers and the lifejacket approval bodies – ISO 12402 committee and the USCG must take the opportunity to review the performance testing requirements for lifejackets.

"In our own testing we found that the correct, secure fitting of the chest belt and leg or crutch straps have the largest impact on the performance of all lifejackets."

It is possible that regulatory agencies like the U.S. Coast Guard may review the reports findings and ammend their testing protocols, but this is usually a lengthy process. Here at Practical Sailor we have already begun discussing including a "surf test" in future inflatable PFD tests. In the meantime, we urge readers to be conscious of PFD fit inflated and in the water, as well as be familiar with servicing regimen. If your current vest does not have a crotch strap, consider adding one, or at least follow our recommendation that the vest be snugy fitted around the torso.

Links to servicing popular types of inflation systems can be found at the bottom of the online version of the July 2013 editorial.

Here at Practical Sailor, we’re continuing work on our own improved PFD/harness design. We’ve gotten some great ideas from some of our engineers in the audience as well as from some well-respected racers and offshore sailors. My March 13, 2012 blog post and March 2012 editorial describe what we’re doing and how you can help. One product that recently caught our eye was the new Quatic Big Wave Surf. The vest, which we have not yet tested, seems to offer a better balance of flotation and mobility that many of our reader-submitted designs sought to achieve. It seems to be particularly well-suited for situations like this and two other recent sailing accidents in California—one in the Farallones Islands near San Francisco and one in a race out of Ensenada—when sailboats were driven toward rocky shores and surf.

Comments (4)

I am a cruiser now 8 years in the South Pacific and had had Spinlock and Mustang vest as my primary offshore vest Mustang has not let me down , I was told Spinlock was more comfortable for long time ware. as they are heavy on your shoulders.. I do not as many hours on the helm on 30 plus days crossing wear the crotch straps as you are in and out of them fairly often .. I have had the Spin lock inflate now twice the latest version and the one of 3 years ago in flate all by it self with a wave that hit me in cockpit then the new version when I was coming into anchor after 14 days at sea I layed it in the cockpit in the channel as my sholders were so sore from wearing a squall hit and rains very strong next thing I felt was a boom and the vest inflating behind me on the seat... seems the rain hit at such an angle it hit a trigger so I am told by spinlock that inflated it.. now that is two vest of the latest models going back now from 6 months ago to y4 years.. I can get models.. I have emailed them pictures and info when it happened also I continue on both to struggle with zippers they are constantly opening to expose all.. the flashlight did not operate till three days later in the cockpit on the first one when wave hit..it left it on deck wore my old mustang... one night on watch this light started flashing source the deck vest hmmm it also had deflated in 24 hours.. so that too was a concern.. it gave me 24 hours to get found.. hmm

many more years of offshore cruising ahead so will follow your advice.. best is clip on .. always inboard never trust life lines.. they break.. had that too.. the pelican hooks give out.. lose a pin the life lines give out.. one hand for the ship.. always... never let go.. when moving about..

Posted by: Unknown | September 14, 2013 3:25 AM    Report this comment

Great job guys! Thanks for both performing and reporting objectively.

Posted by: Barry F | September 11, 2013 3:44 PM    Report this comment

I have read, and been told, that the Spinlock vest has neither passed testing by the USCG or been submitted for same. Perhaps that is no longer the case. Unless it is subjected to their approval process, your statement below is unlikely to lead to a change in the Spinlock design.

"It is possible that regulatory agencies like the U.S. Coast Guard may review the reports findings and ammend their testing protocols, but this is usually a lengthy process."

Fair Winds

Posted by: schneider156 | September 11, 2013 3:23 PM    Report this comment

God bless all !

Posted by: dlblandjr | September 11, 2013 2:07 PM    Report this comment


Add your comments ...

New to Practical Sailor? Register for Free!

Already Registered? Log in

Forgot your password? Click Here.