Gas Vs. Electric Outboards: Consider Your Total Sailing Carbon Footprint

Electric outboards are clean and quiet while gas outboards have electrics beat on range, top speed, “refueling” time, and initial cost. Is there a better way to go green?

21
The 6-hp Tohatsu SailPro, left, weighs 60 lb. and costs about $1,900. A 3-gallon gas tank, when filled, adds about 22 lb. Add to total cost the ongoing expense of fuel, oil and maintenance. The 6- hp/3000 input-watt ePropulsion Navy 3.0, right, weighs 54 lb. and costs about $6,100 including the recommended 73-lb., 48 volt/3072 watt hour E60 battery and a 25-amp charger that can top up the battery in four hours. Electric outboards are much quieter than gas models and don’t emit exhaust, but you will have to replace the expensive battery within 10 years. Prices found online in August 2025. (Photos courtesy of Tohatsu and ePropulsion)
The 6-hp Tohatsu SailPro, left, weighs 60 lb. and costs about $1,900. A 3-gallon gas tank, when filled, adds about 22 lb. Add to total cost the ongoing expense of fuel, oil and maintenance. The 6- hp/3000 input-watt ePropulsion Navy 3.0, right, weighs 54 lb. and costs about $6,100 including the recommended 73-lb., 48 volt/3072 watt hour E60 battery and a 25-amp charger that can top up the battery in four hours. Electric outboards are much quieter than gas models and don’t emit exhaust, but you will have to replace the expensive battery within 10 years. Prices found online in August 2025. (Photos courtesy of Tohatsu and ePropulsion)

If you own or intend to buy an electric outboard because it is clean and quiet, read no further. Today’s four-stroke outboards are much cleaner and quieter than their two-stroke ancestors, but they can’t match electric outboards on these two qualities. As noted in Practical Sailor’s recent Buyer’s Guide: 10 Gas Outboards for Cruising Sailboats, gas outboards offer advantages over electrics including better range, higher top-end speeds, faster “refueling,” and lower initial cost.

To continue reading this article or issue you must be a paid member.

Join Practical Sailor

Get full access to Practical-Sailor.com – more than 4,000 articles – for just $34.
Join today and save 42% off our full price.
Already a member?
| Forgot your password? | Activate Web Access
Doug Henschen has been sailing in and around the waters of the lower Hudson River, New York Harbor, and the Long Island Sound since the 1980s. A career editor and journalist, Doug served as associate editor and managing editor of The Waterway Guide from 1984 until 1987 and as executive editor of Boating Industry magazine from 1990 to 1996. Doug is American Boat and Yacht Council (ABYC) certified on Marine Electrical, Corrosion Mitigation, Disaster Avoidance and Outboard Repowering Considerations.

21 COMMENTS

  1. Our Dragonfly 32 tri has a Yanmar inboard diesel for auxiliary power but we do have a Takacat dinghy that we use when at anchor to go back and forth to shore. We use a Torqeedo electric motor as the dinghy’s propulsion. We bought the high capacity battery for the motor and with it fully charged, we can easily get 5-6 days of 2-3 trips to shore and back every day. Best motoring speed/power consumption is around 3-4 knots as long as the breeze is under 15-18 knots headwind and relatively flat water. Most larger sailboats I see will still use a gas outboard for their dinghies because you have enough power to plane and the range to go further distances (especially if you want to surf, snorkel, or paddle a remote spot).

  2. The different HP rating method for gas (shaft HP) and electric (input HP) is important. Our e-Propulsion is marketed as equivalent to a 3 hp gasser, but it’s just not. We’re still happy with it (quiet, simple, and light weight sans battery), and it does a proper job getting inflatable dink from ship to shore, which is all we ask.

  3. We tried a Torqeedo Travel 1003 on our CLC Passagemaker dinghy as an alternative to the typical RIB and gasoline outboard. It has sat unused after the first season for several reasons.

    The finish precluded leaving it on the dinghy (in davits after fresh water rinsing) the finish deteriorated quickly.
    Although we had two of the larger batteries, range was severely limited by the time and energy required to charge one, much less both batteries. Our 900 W solar array was totally inadequate so we had to run the generator to charge.
    The prop was inadequate due to light weight and design. On two occasions we but floating debris which caused the prop pun to strip the inside of its hub. This proved impossible to repair adequately with epoxy using what we had on the boat.

    We liked the quiet operation, and freedom from gasoline and carburetor repairs, but overall it was a bust. Back to my favorite Yamaha 15HP 2-stroke.

    If you still believe the whole CO2 global warming narrative, I encourage you to read Dr Steven Koonin’s book UNSETTLED.

  4. Thank you for the analysis. Beyond the carbon footprint argument my concern with my 3HP ICE and all the other outboards is the fouling of our waterways from fuel, lubricants and gases. This really should be quantified and of primary concern by the pleasure boating world.

    • My analysis of “carbon emissions” covers the “gases” part of your comment. As for the liquid “fuel” and “lubricants” part of your comment, such liquid emission are minuscule for four-cycle motors, as compared with the horrible two-cycle polluters of old, but, yes, there is still spillage, careless over-priming, etc. My point is to address your carbon footprint and polluting habits in priority order, starting with the biggest culprits. For me that was switching to a hybrid vehicle, eliminating red meat from my diet and drastically reducing the number of airline flights I take each year.

  5. We have a small 14 lb EP Carry electric dinghy motor which we use on our Highfield 310 RIB 90% of the time to go to and from shore in settled weather. Store in lazarette. One hand lift. Faster than rowing but never a surf landing. Battery lasts 1.5 hours. Had a 2 hp Honda with yearly gummy carb. Also have 9.9 Suzuki for power. I love my little electric motor.

  6. Lower pollution at the boat is always preferable but not with the author’s demonstrated cost prohibitive electric (really electric charged battery from mostly nuclear, gas, or coal sources) alternative nor with the illusion of saving the planet from the global cooling (1970s), global warming (1990s), or climate change (2000s+) or whatever it will be called next year green hoax. I own 20 Black and Decker and DeWalt battery (my utility uses nuclear and natural gas) hand and yard tools and their advantages work better than air, gas, or corded electric, but yes the older nickel/cadmium and newer lithium batteries have to be regularly replaced. These batteries get recycled to a refurbishment center. Cars like Tesla have massive batteries and are fast and powerful but my 60 volt DeWalt mower blade needs more power too spin the cross shaped blade faster and cut better and I suspect the sailboat battery motors are also overpriced, and underpowered with limited runtime. In some battery products we are not just there yet. Why would I ever trade my 2008 Land Cruiser for some high mpg often recalled battery SUV? What other than it or a Sequoia has forever been universally rated the longest lasting most reliable SUV? I can seat 7-8 and tow 8,500lbs. Many get 350k-500k lifetime miles. I have a low 175k miles. My tradeoff is very poor (13-17 mpg) gas mileage and poor emissions (I assume and this is on a 5.7 L V8, but SC does not have emissions test). I saw a used boat for sell with a propane outboard and thought that was interesting. I have seen a house burn due to a neighbor’s propane gas tank negligence and we have seen Teslas and bus videos of unextinguishable highly toxic lithium fires. Usind any fuel source we have to be very careful. Maybe a fire extinguisher has finally been made to treat it. Well, technology is always evolving and so must we at the right time. Thanks to the author for a fair and great article. Use long proven products and avoid ones that underperform, are expensive, and are bought to save us from some political theory.

  7. You, like many people, make the mistake of analyzing operating cost against cost per KW hour (your’s is 16 cents) and the cost of gas. You look at gas prices with federal, state and local taxes built into the cost, but not the many taxes added on to the cost of electricity – taxes, delivery, etc, etc. My real cost per KW hr in the Chicago area is over 45 cents per KW hr. It’s still cheeper for electricity but what’s also left out is the tax benefits of the utilities, which are exempt and those of the fossil fuel companies who pay large amounts of taxes, which benefit the country as a whole.

  8. Like electric cars, electric outboards have a range issue. Personally, I don’t think electrics are suitable as a sailboat auxiliary. The wind can die when you are twenty miles from the nearest harbor. or worse, you need the engine to get away from a dangerous situation.

    Where small electrics make sense is as a dinghy motor for day sailors. If you are using the dinghy just to get to and from the dock to the mooring, electrics can be easier to handle than gas. The downside is that you will need access to 110v to recharge the battery.

    As for carbon footprint, I agree with Henschen that outboards are the wrong place to look to make an actual difference. Heating and cooling are the largest consumers of energy. Still, many people use electric vehicles (and outboards) as virtue signaling.

    • The danger of carrying gas is a very good reason for not choosing a gas outboard. I kind of chuckle when I hear e-outboard (or e-inboard) owners say they carry a gas generator just in case. That said, “hybrid” systems are now emerging with (mostly) diesel generators as a backup when solar and regeneration power can’t keep up with the demand on batteries. The propulsion motors are electric, which are very efficient. Submarines and railroad locomotives have long used electric engines powered by diesel generators. I intend to investigate the new breed of marine hybrid systems for a future article.

  9. I’ve converted our sailboat to an electric drive propulsion system, replacing the diesel auxiliary engine. We love the system for all the day sailing that we do and for weekend cruising as well, with about 30 Nm of range with our battery bank. I carry a 2000 watt generator for backup on longer cruises when we don’t expect to find shore power and feel OK with 2 gallons of gasoline versus the 45 gallon diesel tank I used to have. Replacing the noise, smell, soot, and vibration of the diesel engine with the quiet ease of the electric drive has greatly enhanced our boating experience. My next purchase will be an electric outboard to replace the gas outboard we have now. Would like to get gasoline completely off the boat.

  10. We seem to have missed that the E-Propulsion Navy is only 3.4 hp input. There is a vague claim that it is “equivalent to 6 hp,” but no manufacturer backup to the logic, and every head-to-head independent test suggests that it is no more than 3.5 hp. See Ernest’s comment. He’s not the only one. We are NOT comparing apples to apples.

    Thus, the capital cost comparison is way off. I doubt the fuel consumption figure makes sense either; the electric cost of a Tesla has been evaluated to be similar to a 40 mpg car. Only a little more efficient.

    Then there is the efficiency of electricity and what that means for carbon. The makers consistently overlook the upstream losses. According to USDE generation is on 37% efficient. There is 5% loss in transmission (wire losses), and there is charging hysteresis. The overall efficiency (carbon rating) must assume that the overall efficiency of electricity is only 35% before it even reaches the motor. This can all be checked via Google, with a little engineering thrown in. Yes, solar or wind is great, but the incremental power is coal, oil, or gas. Really, solar and wind are powering the base HAVAC, industrial, and lighting loads.

    I get the convenience (but my outboard does start on 1-3 pulls–using the right additive and fuel storage practices really helps). I get the quiet. But I don’t think the carbon or financial arguments are there yet, and range isn’t even close.

    Boats aren’t cars. I’ve looked at this many times, hopefully, but no.

  11. We switched to electric in large part because of the unreliability of gas powered small outboards, despite regular maintenance. On the Chesapeake Bay our dinghy use case is short distances in settled water, which means we rarely have to recharge even on week long trips. I also love not carrying gasoline on our diesel powered sailboat. Admittedly if cruising in the Caribbean we’d make a very different choice. Also, consider lightly used electric outboards. Some people buy them, decide they’re not right for their use case, and sell much cheaper than new.

    • Regarding reliability of small outboards:

      The first article I wrote for Practical Sailor (2008) related to gasoline and additives. I was in the fuels industry and had epic problems with my outboard. I chased down the problems, investigated proper fuel storage and additives, and have not had a single outboard or small engine problem since, including lawn equipment and a string of multihulls with 2-3 outboards (twins plus dinghy).

      The problem with e10 is that it attracts water, and water causes corrosion, carb plugging, and sometimes phase separation.
      * Keep the gas dry. The vent should ONLY be open when running. If it is an installed tank, install a silica gel vent filter. A single rainstorm with an open vent can screw up a dinghy outboard.
      * Use a good anti-corrosion additive. PS has tested many, and Biobor EB Stabil 360 Marine get top marks. There are also many that don’t work.
      * Run the engine every few months if you can. This includes snow blowers and mowers.
      * If the engine does not have a filter (some small ones do not) add a small in-line mower filter and keep a spare. Well worth it.

      Search PS articles on gasoline additives, e10, and vent filters. With proper fuel management, 1-3 pulls should be all it ever takes to start. We tested and researched this for our readers! As a side benefit, I no longer have engine problems. That’s nice.

      • Have to agree with Drew on the ease of starting modern four strokes. I’m guessing many of those experiencing problems are using old two strokes, which are an environmental disaster. If you have a two stoke, put a bullet in it. I used Sta-Bil 360 Marine in my gas and never had a problem starting my Tohatsu 6 hp four stroke.

  12. We bought a new Torqeedo Travel this year, hoping for lighter propulsion and freedom from Gas. So far, it has been a disappointment. Apart from apparent quality issues (a wrong charger in the box, battery poles corroding in 2 weeks, and the prop cracking and shearing before the pin), the horsepower difference has been a significant issue. The lit promised 2-5HP equivalence, but we are much slower than our 2HP Honda.
    More importantly, becuase we have an extended battery, the overall weight is equal to or more, and every time we motorize the dinghy, the battery has to be installed, which is a bummer in our inflatable. And because of range limits, we now have to carry two giant batteries that take all day to charge (on a good day) via solar power.
    I have been told that Torqeedo has been acquired. Maybe with some $$ investment, they can improve, until then – LMK if you are in the market for an e-mote.

  13. Stuart, I just checked and Torqeedo was bought by Yamaha so that they can ‘pursue carbon neutral propulsion options and offer wider distribution channels’, the company said. That happened in Spring last year.

    I have enjoyed the wide variety of perspectives in this article. Rarely do I find so many well informed and experienced adults that behave in providing their opinions. Sailors just want to learn and share experiences and avoid flame wars. What a breath of fresh air in my sails. Well that is why I have checked out of social media and am reducing’news’.