Reflections on the Faux Teak Deck

Posted by at 02:08PM - Comments: (6)


Swedish boatbuilder Hallberg-Rassy is one of several who still favor the teak deck for its excellent durability and non-skid properties.

Being afflicted by an affection for wooden boats, I’ve always been perplexed by the faux teak trend. In my book, you’re either in love with wood and you pay for your love in labor, or you bow to the apparent pragmatism of plastic. For me, a boatbuilder who is seduced by a synthetic wood deck or trim is akin to Ferdinand the Bull ecstatically romping through a field of plastic flowers—that is to say, more than a little confused. Faux teak has neither the aesthetic appeal of teak, nor the durability of other boat-building materials used instead of teak. So who the heck wants this stuff?

This question began to really bug me last week after a visit to the factory for Teak Decking Systems, the best-known domestic supplier of real teak decks, where I learned even this company was branching into plastics. Later that week, as I strolled the Tampa Convention Center where the International Boatbuilders’ Exhibition and Conference was in full swing, I discovered no less than six booths manned by seemingly reasonable salesman proudly selling faux teak decking.

I drove home in a funk, depressed by the thought that the fungible reality that is at the heart of twenty-first century politics, economics, and best-selling memoirs has found a permanent home on the entry-level sailboat. Yes, perhaps from a distance, a landlubber might mistake fake teak for something real—but if that is all that faux teak is good for, who would bother with it? Sailors generally don’t strike me as people who are out to impress the huddled masses gazing wistfully from the shore. 

As it turns out, there is a perfectly sensible answer to my question—but first, here is a short list of the companies I bumped into at IBEX who are happily engaged in the faux teak trade: Ameriteak Flexiteek, Permateek, and Plasteak. Our last comparison of synthetic teak decks included samples from TekDek, and the cork-based Marinedeck 2000. Another product on the market is Nuteak. I noticed some nuanced differences among the products, but not enough to persuade me one is better than the other. Some testing will no doubt sort that out.

Photo courtesy of Permateek
Photo courtesy of Permateek

Synthetic teak decking material is sold in sheets that can be cut to fit and glued directly to fiberglass.

Given the growing interest in synthetic deck material (our recent test of non-skid coatings and the 12-month update included several synthetics), we’ll be looking at these products again. I’m sure there are a few players in the synthetic teak world that I’m missing here, so if you have some product recommendations, just add a comment below. One of the key characteristics we looked at in our last test was durability. We’ll look at this again, but we’re also interested in resistance to chemicals and UV exposure.

I’ve blogged about the diminishing amount of wood on contemporary boats before. That post focused primarily on items such as toe-rails, handholds, and trim. Most people who left comments were delighted to be free of the drudgery of teak maintenance. I wonder if these same people would look longingly toward a faux-wood alternative instead of the more common substitutes—fiberglass, stainless steel, aluminum, or Starboard? If you’re shying away from wood, why try to hide it? Or is there something else at work here?

According to the people I spoke with at Teak Decking Systems and IBEX, the biggest market for synthetic woods in the marine industry is not sailboats builders, but poweryacht and cruise ship builders looking for cost-effective substitutes for teak. That makes sense. Excepting perhaps for the trawler crowd, it seems obvious that the notion of a “synthetic” product would carry fewer negative connotations for powerboaters and cruise ship patrons. (Who would complain about ersatz wood when Goofy and Mickey are cavorting on the Lido Deck?)

So, poweryachts and cruise ships are the market drivers. The “why” question is harder to answer. Cost of materials and installation is certainly an important factor. When building a new boat, the teak deck accounts for a large share of the materials costs. And when replacing an old teak deck, the cost of new teak deck can exceed the boat's market value.

While the initial outlay for a synthetic deck may be relatively low, Teak Decking System contends that this initial cost conceals the full price it exacts from the environment. The company argues that if you take into account the VOC emissions during synthetic wood production and the way teak plantations offset carbon emissions, manufacturing with real teak leaves a smaller carbon footprint.

But cost alone is not driving the switch to synthetics in new boats. Tastes are also shifting. For decades, teak has been a closely regulated plantation product, with trees cultivated to meet specific grades. However, as demand has increased, the quality of the wood is dropping. Higher moisture content and irregularities in color are appearing more frequently. This adds hours and cost to the selection and installation process. Purchasers of high-priced yachts who are accustomed to uniform grain and color in their teak decks have been forced to pay through the nose, or adjust their expectations.

Interestingly, the variability and flaws in real teak is what still draws many builders to the material. For them, the random shades of gold and brown serve as a constant reminder that the world we live in is an imperfect one—not plastic.

Comments (6)

I had a Hylas 49 with teak decks for 10 years. I lovingly sanded and cleaned (brushing against the grain to avoid pulp damage) and sealed, knowing that was the price of the "look" I wanted on a boat. That said, it grows old fast. I have a 57' sailboat now with Flexiteak for a deck and it looks the way I want, but requires none of the annual costs and labor my teak deck did. Its NOT cheaper initially, but in the long run costs less when you consider sealing, re-caulking, sanding, cleaning, etc.. I've been happy so far, but the faux teak manufacturers need to stand behind their warranties. Its been 2 years now and no probems, but the jury is out for 10 years or 15. The moment people have trouble and they are not there to back up their products, people will stop choosing them. So far so good.

Posted by: BlackDiamond | January 4, 2019 6:41 AM    Report this comment

You missed one other product in this review, SeaCork. It's another cork product like Marine Deck 2000, but with larger grains of cork, and therefore less binder, so exhibits more of the good cork characteristics: excellent non-skid properties, quiet and soft underfoot, and doesn't absorb solar heat, to name a few. In terms of carbon footprint, there is not other that comes close. The cork industry is sustainably managed, and SeaCork is a by product of the cork stopper industry, which results in almost no waste. A true win-win.

Posted by: Randy | December 9, 2015 11:05 AM    Report this comment

I understand your love for real teak and the love of many others for it also. Those that want real teak should definitely get it. The reason I have heard from most boaters as to why they invest in synthetic teak is the upkeep and holes drilled all over their boat with real teak. Ameriteak's product is 5 mil's thick where many of the customers are 4 mil's. Ameriteak's product shares a patent on the special t-grove bottom to insure better bonding. Ameriteak's products are completely sanded after being installed to remove the ,"plastic," appearance and convince folks passing by that it is real teak. Lat week we installed it on a completely refurbished 48 ft sailboat and will be removing all of the toe rails and bumpers soon to replace with synthetics. In this day and age boaters want ease and performance.

With all due respect, I beg to differ about the carbon footprint. Synthetic teak manufactures have stringent standards to operate within that emit hardly anything compared to a couple of decades ago. Real teak cuts down trees while much of our product is made from recycled material making it a better choice for the planet.
Thank you,

Jerry T
General Manager of Ameriteak North America

Posted by: Jerryt | October 29, 2015 7:02 PM    Report this comment

I, too am less than thrilled with the idea of faux teak for boats, but haven't yet used any. The cost of teak makes us look for alternatives, and I am interested to see what your testing shows. I recently had to replace a stern seat on my sailboat and chose Ipe instead of teak because of the marked difference in cost.
One issue that I didn't see mentioned in your article is the scrap from plastic products. I was surprised when I replaced a small portion of deck on my house with Trex, and found that the cutoffs were not recyclable. If the same is true for faux decking (nothing is ever 100% usable), I think the impact of scrap plastic should also be factored. Wood scraps can go in the woodstove if not otherwise usable.

Posted by: Deb H | October 9, 2014 4:04 PM    Report this comment

This argument is somewhat akin to the question of what type of siding to use on a house. If you use a "natural" product like cedar of fir, the boards will likely need the imperfections cut out, resulting in wasted material. On the other hand, a manufactured product such as concrete based siding is 100% useable.
If the plantation teak today is of poorer quality, then one would think there's going to be a lot of waste in a lift of deck boards.

Posted by: WM | October 8, 2014 10:52 AM    Report this comment

I enjoy sailing my boat, not sanding and varnishing! I think even faux teak looks more inviting than hard plastic/fiberglass. Some people like their hull blue, some white, some other colors. This is in part a cosmetic decision but frees us to enjoy our boats. Don't worry...there's plenty of other things to work on and fix.

Posted by: dbirken | October 8, 2014 9:49 AM    Report this comment

New to Practical Sailor?
Register for Free!

Already Registered?
Log In