PS Readers Divided Over America’s Cup Coverage


PS Readers Divided Over America’s Cup Coverage

Earlier this year, my provocative blog post asked readers to help decide whether PS should dedicate some ink to the Americas Cup in San Francisco this summer. The post generated an overwhelming response, and at this point, the yeas have only a slight edge over the nays.

Almost all of those whod rather not see Cup coverage were emphatic: Please don’t fill your great magazine with Americas Cup dribble. As a cruiser, I have absolutely no interest in it, wrote one reader.

And most readers who encouraged PS to cover the event did so with reservation: If you pick your topic, the AC certainly has practical value. For example, when these boats break, how are they repaired? As more boats are made from exotic materials, which structures are found to be more durable, more flexible, more brittle, or less repairable after damage?

In other words, “keep it real.”

Most agreed that from a spectators standpoint, this years event, which features super high-tech catamarans, promised to be more exciting than previous Cups. However, as PSEditor-at-Large and Chief Measurer for the Americas CupNick Nicholson (no relation to me, other than clan)pointed out, this also creates a Grand Canyon-size chasm between the equipment and materials on Cup boats and the boats most of us sail. To make matters worse, the veil of secrecy surrounding much of the secret sauce that goes into these boats makes it more difficult for even the snoopiest journalist to know whats going to be applicable to cruising boats.

PS Readers Divided Over America’s Cup Coverage

Frankly, these boats are so different from what we usually deal with, that its really hard to visualize what may actually trickle down into the world of normal sailing, Nick told me in an email. Part of the problem now is that much of what they are doing is highly proprietary, and I can’t even discuss it, much less photograph it.

So, I suppose this is a long-winded way of saying the vote goes on. Should we cover the Cup this summer, or just leave it to those fancy magazines with the fancy watch ads? Right now, my tally shows 25 people in favor of coverage, and 22 people against, with four comments too ambiguous to count, such as: Now if they could find someone else other than Gary Jobson to serve as color commentator, I would really be excited about it.

For those fence-sitters out there, or for those who havent yet cast their vote, here are a few Cup teasers. The AC public relations machine has put together an interesting extended video recap of Dennis Conners historic bid to reclaim the Cup from Down Under. It has a few snooze sections to fast forward through, but you can almost feel a heart-attack coming on as the skippers clearly begin to take this event personally.

If you’re curious about what sort of coverage I had in mind. It would most certainly be focused on elements that are relevant to our readership. Here’s a link to a report Nick did for us in 2002 on the technology used in the Cup boats of that era. If anything, it offers a good picture of how drastically the boats have changed.

Finally, if youre not yet up to speed on whats actually going on over on the West Coast, the big event last month was the re-launching of the repaired USA-17, the AC72 that capsized in spectacular fashion last year. Heres a cool video of the capsize, that gives a pretty good idea of how fast these boats go. In fact, youll find no shortage of exciting AC footage on the Web, if youre handy with Google searches.

So what is it like to ride on one of these super-charged catamarans? Nick had the opportunity to sail on one a few weeks ago, in nearly ideal conditions, and summed it up thusly: Foiling at 40 knots with only about 20 knots of breeze is an unbelievable experience, once you get past the shock and awe of always sailing in a gale of apparent wind with a hurricane’s worth of salt water in your face.

I think that was the one thing everyone was unanimous on: Even if they didnt want to read about the Cup, no one said theyd refuse a chance to race an AC72 across San Fran bay at 40 knots. And I wouldnt expect anything less.

Thanks again for all your feedback. I’ll keep the voting open through April. Post “yeas” or “nays” here, or at the previous post.

Practical Sailor has been independently testing and reporting on marine products for serious sailors for more than 45 years. Supported entirely by subscribers, Practical Sailor accepts no advertising or any form of compensation from manufacturers whose products we test. Testing is carried out by a team of experts from a wide range of fields including marine electronics, marine safety, marine surveying, sailboat rigging, sailmaking, engineering, ocean sailing, sailboat racing, and sailboat construction and design. This diversity of expertise allows us to carry out in-depth, objective evaluation of virtually every product available to serious sailors. Practical Sailor is edited by Darrell Nicholson, a long-time liveaboard sailor and trans-Pacific cruiser with more than three decades of experience as a marine writer, photographer, boat captain, and product tester. Before taking on the editor’s position at Practical Sailor, Darrell was the editor of Offshore magazine, a boating-lifestyle magazine serving the New England area. Darrell has won multiple awards from Boating Writer’s International, including the Monk Farnham award for editorial excellence. He holds a U.S. Coast Guard 100-ton Master license and has worked as a harbor pilot and skippered a variety of commercial charter boats.


Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here