Test Checks Burst Point and Freeze Protection

0

Burst Point and Freeze Protection

We tested each product for glycol content using a refractometer and either the ethylene glycol or propylene glycol scale, as appropriate. In the case of Camcos Arctic Ban and Sudburys Winter Stor, some portion of the freeze protection is provided by ethanol, and such mixtures cannot be easily evaluated by any field method (test tape, gravity, refractometer) unless the exact proportion is known, which we find troublesome.

Unfortunately, there is no ASTM or generally agreed upon standard test for burst point; we used the same test as many manufacturers using 50-milliliter vials.

To test corrosion protection, we immersed bundles of metal coupons (copper, aluminum, and brass, galvanically coupled) in the antifreeze products, tap water (control), and vodka for two months.

To test chemical compatibility, we reviewed past tests involving toilet joker valves and water system components, and dug into our leftover parts bin for some new tests with ethanol. We examined the parts for cracking and stiffening. None were horrible, but the result will vary according to concentration, temperature, polymer formulation, and winterizing agent formulation.

To test freezing and burst point, the vials were placed in a glycol bath in a freezer set to 0 degrees. At 20 degrees, the vial containing seawater cracked; by 10 degrees, several of the samples began to freeze; and by 0 degrees, all samples had gelled completely, except for Star brite -50, which gelled at -5 degrees. By -10 degrees, all of the samples were solid.

After repeated freeze/thaw cycling at 0 degrees, we pulled a small sample from the top of the duplicate samples and tested freeze point by refractometer. During partial freeze, ice floats, separating the water from the glycol, so the material at the top had lost as much as 7 percent of its glycol content, reducing protection-another reason not to rely too heavily on theoretical burst-point temperatures for determining the right concentration.

We also monitored evaporation at 70 degrees and relative humidity at 65 percent. Only the ethanol-based products were noticeably affected: as a result of evaporation, their freeze point was raised by 2 degrees.

Practical Sailor has been independently testing and reporting on marine products for serious sailors for more than 45 years. Supported entirely by subscribers, Practical Sailor accepts no advertising or any form of compensation from manufacturers whose products we test. Testing is carried out by a team of experts from a wide range of fields including marine electronics, marine safety, marine surveying, sailboat rigging, sailmaking, engineering, ocean sailing, sailboat racing, and sailboat construction and design. This diversity of expertise allows us to carry out in-depth, objective evaluation of virtually every product available to serious sailors. Practical Sailor is edited by Darrell Nicholson, a long-time liveaboard sailor and trans-Pacific cruiser with more than three decades of experience as a marine writer, photographer, boat captain, and product tester. Before taking on the editor’s position at Practical Sailor, Darrell was the editor of Offshore magazine, a boating-lifestyle magazine serving the New England area. Darrell has won multiple awards from Boating Writer’s International, including the Monk Farnham award for editorial excellence. He holds a U.S. Coast Guard 100-ton Master license and has worked as a harbor pilot and skippered a variety of commercial charter boats.

LEAVE A REPLY

Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here